Student project · Case study · Razorpay-related use case

Make one payment workflow easier to follow.

A proposed AI agent prototype for a focused Razorpay-related task, designed to make the next step clearer without hiding the underlying workflow.

Read the case study
Paper workflow with blue paths converging on a green resolution mark

A visual study of movement from uncertainty to a resolved next step.

Start narrow. Make the handoff clear.

The exact job, user, data access, integrations, and success criteria are still being defined. This first build treats that uncertainty as part of the design problem.

Rather than position a broad assistant, the case study will select one concrete user and one triggering situation, then test whether a focused layer can reduce manual effort and provide clearer guidance.

Untidy payment papers beside a clean, structured workflow sheet
Before / after study · structure over noise

Clarity is the outcome.

The likely alternatives are dashboards, documentation, support channels, manual operations, or conventional software paths. The prototype earns its place by addressing one evidenced friction point, not by promising everything.

Working hypothesis

A focused conversational or automated layer can help a target user complete one clearly defined task with less ambiguity.

From trigger to next step.

A deliberately small sequence keeps the agent useful, measurable, and honest about its boundaries.

01

Choose one trigger

Start with one payment, support, reconciliation, or account task where the friction is visible.

02

Ground the response

Keep the agent close to the relevant workflow, payment state, and available evidence.

03

Escalate with care

When the prototype cannot safely help, make the next human step clear instead of guessing.

Assist first. Escalate when needed.

The agent should support the person inside the workflow, not obscure it. If a request moves beyond the evidence or the prototype's boundary, a human handoff is part of a good outcome.

Person reviewing a payment status sheet beside a laptop
The interface is only useful when the person can trust the next move.

Evidence over assumption.

01

Task completion

Can the target user finish the selected workflow with fewer unclear handoffs?

02

Response accuracy

Does the prototype stay grounded in the workflow instead of making broad AI claims?

03

Appropriate escalation

Does it recognize the boundary of what it knows and route the moment to a person?

Review the workflow, not a promise.

See the proposed path, the assumptions behind it, and the next validation step for a practical Razorpay-related case study.

See how it works